.:[Double Click To][Close]:.

Sunday, May 8, 2011

shifty shellshock 2009

shifty shellshock 2009. tatjana patitz 2009.
  • tatjana patitz 2009.



  • digitalbiker
    Aug 29, 12:36 AM
    To get a new design and enclosure is always nice. Apple has been doing amazing designs in the past years. For sure new enclosures will look nice.

    The thing is, at this time after the whole Intel transition, all the current enclosures stayed the same (except few changes on Macbook). So, I would not expect anything different anytime soon. I think the current look is great in all Apple hardware line up.


    I don't know. I think the latest MBP was rushed to market a bit. I think Apple just wanted to get to intel and really ddn't think about design.

    The current PB look has been around since 2001. I think the alumin look is starting to look soooo 2000. Were heading toward time to move on with a new chip and a new look.

    Personally I prefer plastic to metal. Metal shows way too many scratches, finger prints, smudges, etc. The smooth shiny plastic look is much better and it is more durable. The metal enclosures dent, bend and break. They also transmit the heat faster to your lap and interfere with BT and Airport. The plastic enclosures give and spring back like new.

    Gun Metal ABS plastic with rounded smooth corners, new keyboard, quick access ram, HD, and battery, magnetic latch, sound like the future to me.:D





    shifty shellshock 2009. 08/06/2009 - Katelyn Pippy
  • 08/06/2009 - Katelyn Pippy



  • derbothaus
    Mar 23, 12:34 PM
    Wonder if they'll use i7-2600 or the laptop parts? i7-2600 would be sick. But at 3.4GHz, the fans would be loud and the case would be hot. I guess we have that with the 2.93 i7 so never mind.





    shifty shellshock 2009. nick carter 2009.
  • nick carter 2009.



  • cwt1nospam
    Jan 3, 08:09 AM
    Ummm.... Didn't most of the early iOS jail breaking methods target holes in OS. Sure more grey hat than black hat but risk is there to be aware of regardless of platform.
    That "risk" requires the active participation of the user. That's a huge difference from simply tricking them into clicking/tapping on something.

    In theory, your bank account is vulnerable to a hacker getting you to deliberately withdraw cash and give it to them, even though you know what they're trying to do. Is that a realistic possibility? It's not any less real than the same hacker getting you to deliberately jail break your iPhone so they can send you a virus.





    shifty shellshock 2009. Dwight Howard 2009 NBA Finals
  • Dwight Howard 2009 NBA Finals



  • superleccy
    Sep 4, 07:23 PM
    Maybe I am dense, but why stream it to the TV wen a mini can connect to the TV after downloading the show? Maybe to send it to multiple TVs in the house at the same time? Sounds expensive and short lived.
    Well I'd like it. I have an iBook G4 hooked up to a 250Gb LaCie drive, on which I store stuff I've pulled from Elgato EyeTV2.x. They sit upstairs. My TV, on the other hand, is downstairs. I can't be bothered carrying my Laptop AND my LaCie AND their power supplies downstairs every time I want to watch a show. I want to sit in my living room, and browse my recorded content without having to physically touch my Mac.

    I don't want to buy a Mac Mini (and then pay twice for every subsequent release OS X).

    And then hey, I guess I could do all the other Front Row stuff too. Sorted.

    A "Video AirPort Exprerss" is the way to go... come on Apple!

    Regds
    SL





    shifty shellshock 2009. angus t jones 2009. angus t
  • angus t jones 2009. angus t



  • daneoni
    Sep 12, 03:24 PM
    what do you mean my windows is close not to upgrade??

    and also, is there any chance that i might be succeeding in returning it... or even getting a refund??? i mean i took the vinyl cover off and just totally used it... can i return it right back to the apple store??

    I meant return window..its just one day. Im not sure about the return but just give it a shot. If they ask, tell them you'd like to buy the new version. Be polite but firm as much as possible and you should be fine. Worst case scenario is they say no BUT you won't feel bad because you're current iPod is definately not out of date from what i see today





    shifty shellshock 2009. David Walliams image
  • David Walliams image



  • Northgrove
    Apr 19, 07:52 AM
    Samsung running Android look very very similar to Apple's, to the point where it causes confusion in the marketplace for consumers. I've seen several people mistake one of these things for an iPhone because they look that similar. It's a combination of Google's Android and Samsung's hardware.

    This confusion is no accident, that was the intent all along. There is no reason why they could not create their own look and feel... change it up enough so it's not an obvious copy. Other handset makers have been able to do that.

    I agree. Sometimes I think this kind of lawsuits are a stretch and a bit silly, but not this time. When there's confusion even to me as a geek after a quick glance on these smarthpones, I have to agree that it's gone too far. It's obvious that Samsung is simply mimicking Apple at this point to ride on their popularity wave, and thus leeching off their profits. That just can't be right.

    I've seen other comments in this thread, comments saying that iPhone UI's haven't changed the last four years, so Apple aren't actually renewing themselves. This is however completely besides the point -- no company has an obligation to do so, especially when the UI is part of their brand and image, like in Apple's case. Then it's counterproductive to change UI drastically bi-yearly. Their patents are invalidated even if they don't renew themselves.

    I like how the iPhone revolutionized the idea with apps and app markets, and still maintaining ease-of-use, but I had really assumed that major competitors like Samsung would be able to keep competing while not starting their carbon copiers. Yes -- there are many undiscovered ways of building a smartphone, especially in terms of the software which I imagine is what Apple is getting at here.





    shifty shellshock 2009. ray show robin mcgraw on
  • ray show robin mcgraw on



  • Multimedia
    Sep 13, 01:19 AM
    The files are much larger both the bought stuff and the home encodes. (but thats what you expect with four times the pixels) but they look fantastic when your ipod is connected to a tv compared to the old encodes.Yes except I have been getting excellent looking TV playback from iPod w/oH.264 by encoding 544x400 SD and 624x352 HD and I am able to keep the bit rate down to no more than 1000kbps HD and 700 SD still looking great.

    The Apple H.264 Fixed Export bitrate is aparently 1500 kbps which I think is excessive and unnecessary.

    To sum up after testing the new H.264 640x480 fixed preset encoder Apple offers in QT Pro:

    1. Result is a 640x480 1639kbps 222MB mp4 movie after three stage process that takes much longer than:
    2. NON H.264 Two-pass Handbrake FFmpeg encoding 544x400 - Max res allowed pre-iPod 1.2 - 739kbps 100MB mp4 movie looks almost the same.
    3. I'm gonna have to remain a NON-H.264 advocate under these circumstances.

    I just can't see the additional file size being worth it. In fact, my guess is, if I could control the size of the H.264 export, the 100MB version would be inferior to the Handbrake NON version @ 100MB 2-pass. They are just that close when looking at both of the above.

    Note: We don't yet know what the new NON H.264 maximum resolution is that is still iPod compatible under the new 1.2 OS. We can't assume it's also 640 x 480 without H.264 encoding. That is not clear at all yet.





    shifty shellshock 2009. kim basinger 2009. kim
  • kim basinger 2009. kim



  • CplBadboy
    Apr 30, 01:21 PM
    Really do hope the option of a fully loaded iMac is well specced and not just the inclusion of TB and the processor. For the money Ill be spending Im expecting 8Gb RAM as standard and a rather meaty GPU. Roll on tuesday!





    shifty shellshock 2009. Fran Drescher, 23rd March 2009
  • Fran Drescher, 23rd March 2009



  • NT1440
    Apr 19, 04:07 PM
    Of course that is ridiculous, and I totally agree there should be a line, but where do we draw it? Who gets to draw it?


    There is this funny phenomena where workers get together and meet with their employers to negotiate these things.

    Lucky for us, the Republi****s are actively pushing incredibly hard to rid the country of such an evil phenomenon.





    shifty shellshock 2009. Published: 02 Aug 2009
  • Published: 02 Aug 2009



  • nomad01
    Sep 5, 04:08 PM
    Who also owns the trademark "Mighty Mouse", which Apple licensed. I think he might be onto something. More then likely, the product is called "Showtime".

    Or... the iSHow? :D

    My money's on a new iPod Hi-fi. How cool would that be? Huh? Huh?? :rolleyes:

    I am quite excited though. It doesn't seem like a new video iPod is on the cards just yet but maybe some other new gadgets are about to make thei debut.

    I do like the idea of the metal nano too.

    I'll be hooked to Macrumors next week anyway!





    shifty shellshock 2009. billie joe armstrong 2009.
  • billie joe armstrong 2009.



  • macintel4me
    Sep 5, 07:24 AM
    I really wish the media device rumor is true, but i would highly doubt that Apple would bring out the successor to the iPod this early. May be it is a pilot program like the Rockr phone for music on cell phones that Apple wants to experiment with by throwing a media streaming device in the market!

    Also, i really wish the movies are priced at $4.99 rather than $9.99!
    No, no, no! The iPod is for mobile entertainment. The media device is for the living room. Nothing mutually exclusive about these at all.





    shifty shellshock 2009. Shannon Tweed; shannon tweed.
  • Shannon Tweed; shannon tweed.



  • MacRumors
    Jul 14, 09:14 AM
    http://www.macrumors.com/images/macrumorsthreadlogo.gif (http://www.macrumors.com)

    DailyTech reports (http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=3228) that the Non-Disclosure for performance benchmarks on Intel's upcoming Intel Core 2 Duo and Core 2 Extreme processors was lifted today. The new processors, code named Conroe, are the desktop versions of the Core Duo processors which currently reside in Apple's MacBook, MacBook Pro and iMac computers.

    Core 2 Duo and Core 2 Extreme processors have a plethora of new features including Intel Wide Dynamic Execution, Intel Smart Memory Access, Intel Advanced Smart Cache and Intel Advanced Digital Media Boost.

    The Core 2 Duo and Core 2 Extreme could make their Mac debut in Apple's PowerMac computers which are rumored to be released on August 7th 2006 at the World Wide Developers Conference.

    Intel is expected to start shipping the new processors on July 23rd with an official announcement on July 27th. The Core 2 Duo will have clock speeds of 1.86GHz, 2.13GHz, 2.4GHz and 2.67GHz while the Core 2 Extreme will clock in at 2.93GHz. All share a 1066MHz front side bus with between 2-4MB of L2 cache. Pricing for the chips range from $183 to $999 per chip.

    As mentioned above, a number of benchmarks of the new chips have been released today, with DailyTech providing a roundup (http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=3319) of many reviews.





    shifty shellshock 2009. Kalika Moquin,
  • Kalika Moquin,



  • Amazing Iceman
    Mar 30, 11:55 AM
    I'm thinkin' Apple should have gone with "iApp Store" (u heard it here FIRST! Let me get a trademark/patent on that) b/c Microsoft is just a big ole' COPYCAT...lol :D

    It's not easy to pronounce "iApp Store". It wouldn't have worked out too well.

    Apple should have patented "AppStore" as one word instead of two words "App Store". Or should have patented both to be safe.

    Anyways, phonetically both sound the same, and that may be a good argument; it worked for Microsoft when they sued "Lindows".





    shifty shellshock 2009. TODAY s Meredith Vieira
  • TODAY s Meredith Vieira



  • bjdku
    Sep 13, 09:08 PM
    This is stated so matter of fact. There is no ? in the title. How certain is arn? He always uses ?


    I am quoting myself! arn went ahead and added to question mark to the title.

    QCassidy352, you can deposit your savings in my escrow account and we will see if this thing happens.





    shifty shellshock 2009. CA on September 19, 2009.
  • CA on September 19, 2009.



  • ZipZap
    Apr 22, 11:25 AM
    Is this a true statement from the OP: "But with new Sandy Bridge processors from Intel sporting improved graphics performance"





    shifty shellshock 2009. June 5, 2009. suicideblonde:
  • June 5, 2009. suicideblonde:



  • twoodcc
    Sep 13, 09:01 PM
    hmmmm, interesting, wonder when it'll come out

    that's my response as well





    shifty shellshock 2009. Sep 18, 2009 11:08 AM
  • Sep 18, 2009 11:08 AM



  • emw
    Aug 23, 04:42 PM
    Really, though $100 million isn't all that significant to a company with reserves like Apple has, vs. having a possible patent infringement hanging over them that could, given a ruling against them, cost much more.





    shifty shellshock 2009. Swimsuit 2009: ar refaeli
  • Swimsuit 2009: ar refaeli



  • MacSA
    Sep 4, 05:00 AM
    http://www.thinksecret.com/news/0609sept12event.html

    Apple will take advantage of a September 12 media event to introduce the second-generation iPod nano, an updated 5G iPod, and upgraded iMacs, sources report. Additional members of the media are slated to received invitations to the event this week..





    shifty shellshock 2009. Baptiste Giabiconi (March 2009
  • Baptiste Giabiconi (March 2009



  • mlrproducts
    Sep 13, 11:41 PM
    I hope the iPhone can be use iChat and we can video chat with and Mac at any time.

    Not to be mean, I am being redundant, but the chances of that happening when/if this phone is released is about the same as a Powerbook G5 coming out in matching colors.





    Warbrain
    Apr 20, 10:08 AM
    Agree to that, but why is it being collected without permission?

    I bet it's somewhere in the ToC that none of us read.





    mrzeigler
    Mar 22, 07:19 PM
    Good, my iMac G4 began to act its age � but really only with PS3 � a couple of months ago. I plan to again max out the processor, memory and harddrive upgrades and get another 7.5 years out of this next one.





    tpg
    Apr 25, 01:27 PM
    What about the screen? Are they finally moving to 16:9 screens?

    I hope not - retaining the 16:10 aspect ratio is one thing I really admire about Apple's notebooks. (11inch Air aside)

    16:9 displays are cheaper to manufacture, but from a usability/aesthetic point of view 16:10 is superior IMO. Vertical space is at a premium, particularly on a laptop screen. Also, 16:10 is pretty darn close to the golden ratio...





    jacg
    Sep 14, 02:14 AM
    Wouldn't the scroll wheel be difficult to use right at the bottom of the device like that?





    AppleScruff1
    Apr 25, 05:57 PM
    Hopefully they get rid of the sharp needle points where you open the cover. I know a guy who slashed his wrist open on the sharp point.