Patmian212
Sep 27, 08:02 AM
Possibilities are only limited to just anyting electronical or computer related ie an isight or computer sleeve.
buckawheat
Sep 7, 02:03 AM
I use both - invisible shield for screen, contour showcase for the body - protects screen from scratches and ipod from drops.
macduke
Oct 27, 03:35 AM
Weird, I could have swore that AT&T had the 3g iPad since launch.
Btrthnezr3
May 6, 07:06 PM
I don't know specifically about the jailbreak but I'm guessing that if you go in to the Apple store for your broken home button, they will give you a different phone (refurb).
That may make this a moot question.
That may make this a moot question.
Darwin
May 1, 09:01 AM
I have set up the MacBook of my girl friend to get remote access to my home network by a VPN connection. I did this mainly to make it possible for her to copy files from my MacPro. The VPN connection works very well but she cannot "see" my MacPro in the Finder. When she comes visiting me and logs into my network by WLAN she can see the MacPro and download files.
What is my mistake? I assumed that the MacPro treats an incoming VPN connection like another Mac which is on the network. Apparently this is wrong. What can I do to make it work as I want it to work?
Just to clarify, the VPN server is a router or the Mac Pro?
Scanning the network uses Bonjour and Bonjour (at least in my experience) has never worked when joining a network via VPN. Of course it is still possible to do tasks like file sharing and such but you will need to manually connect through the Mac Pro's local IP address.
What is my mistake? I assumed that the MacPro treats an incoming VPN connection like another Mac which is on the network. Apparently this is wrong. What can I do to make it work as I want it to work?
Just to clarify, the VPN server is a router or the Mac Pro?
Scanning the network uses Bonjour and Bonjour (at least in my experience) has never worked when joining a network via VPN. Of course it is still possible to do tasks like file sharing and such but you will need to manually connect through the Mac Pro's local IP address.
Chrispy
Jul 1, 12:44 PM
What kind of price range are you talking about here. I have a pretty freakin' loaded T61 14.1" for which I don't know the specs right off hand. I know it has dedicated nvidia graphics, 2GB Ram and 802.11N wireless plus a 7,200 RPM HDD (100GB I believe) and a Core 2 Duo processor. It is still in great shape and is still under warranty until I think Sept.
im_to_hyper
Nov 30, 03:44 PM
I do have an NTSC Xbox I could sell you --- but you'd have to install your own modchip, since I really don't wanna mess anything up.
Clive At Five
Oct 25, 09:18 AM
I can only see this as a good thing for Apple. They don't make much, if any, money off of iTMS sales. They run the store at cost or near that to fuel the sale of iPods. If some other company (or companies) can offer either (a) similar content for a lower price, or under a different business model (rental type music, for example) that works on FairPlay devices, read: iPods, then it's a reason to go buy MORE iPods. This generates money for Apple without the expense of running iTMS. Alternatively, if (b) a company is offering content that Apple is NOT offering (indie music, other TV shows, etc) then it's incetive for someone who wouldn't otherwise want an iPod to buy one.
The only bad thing for Apple would be if they created a compatible player, so you could buy a low priced music device and then buy iTMS content, which is basically at cost, without paying the so-called "iPod Tax". It doesn't sound like that's what's happening, though.
Damn. Exactly what I was going to say... down to the letter. So I shall repeat with different words to those listening:
Apple makes pennies on the iTMusicS (the story might be different for shows and games). Some people want to own an iPod, but don't want to pay iTS store prices or use their $0.99/song, end of story, model. Solution: buy mp3, d/l mp3 illegally, buy FairPlay elsewhere. With exception of Real Harmony, the last option has not existed.
Where Apple makes the money is iPod sales. HUGE money. However, Apple can't promote the three aforementioned options outright, not when it has the largest FairPlay (and altogether) legal music d/l store on the 'net. So the only thing they can do is not dissuade people from using the other options... forcefully, at least. All I remember Apple saying about Real Harmony was "they're hackers with questionable methods," or something like that.
As Mr. Green said, the only risk I would see is if others tried to make a FairPlay compatible "mp3" player. I wouldn't see it going places unless sync'd with iTunes or a different phenominal jukebox. Thus, Apple likely writes that possibility off as someone else "pulling a Zune."
hehe. We don't even know how the zune will do in reality but we love to pick on it here. I must be on a Mac Forum. :p
-Clive
The only bad thing for Apple would be if they created a compatible player, so you could buy a low priced music device and then buy iTMS content, which is basically at cost, without paying the so-called "iPod Tax". It doesn't sound like that's what's happening, though.
Damn. Exactly what I was going to say... down to the letter. So I shall repeat with different words to those listening:
Apple makes pennies on the iTMusicS (the story might be different for shows and games). Some people want to own an iPod, but don't want to pay iTS store prices or use their $0.99/song, end of story, model. Solution: buy mp3, d/l mp3 illegally, buy FairPlay elsewhere. With exception of Real Harmony, the last option has not existed.
Where Apple makes the money is iPod sales. HUGE money. However, Apple can't promote the three aforementioned options outright, not when it has the largest FairPlay (and altogether) legal music d/l store on the 'net. So the only thing they can do is not dissuade people from using the other options... forcefully, at least. All I remember Apple saying about Real Harmony was "they're hackers with questionable methods," or something like that.
As Mr. Green said, the only risk I would see is if others tried to make a FairPlay compatible "mp3" player. I wouldn't see it going places unless sync'd with iTunes or a different phenominal jukebox. Thus, Apple likely writes that possibility off as someone else "pulling a Zune."
hehe. We don't even know how the zune will do in reality but we love to pick on it here. I must be on a Mac Forum. :p
-Clive
CosmoPilot
Apr 28, 09:01 PM
Problem just showed up today.
I have iTunes set to sync the last 12 months worth of events from iPhoto to my iPhone. I have never had a problem until today. I recently upgraded the new iPhoto '11 v9.1.2.
I'll take pictures on one day and then upload them into iPhoto. The next day or so, I'll do the same and Merge them into the same event. For instance, if the pictures are just random (no specific event like a birthday, etc.) I'll just name the event "March 2011" As such, I might take some photos early in the month and then merge some photos into that event that I've taken at the end of the month.
iTunes has always recognized my Merged events as a single entity. Now, in iTunes, all my events have multiple entries. In other words, I now show 4 separate March 2011 events in iTunes...even though iPhoto only has 1 actual event for March 2011. Its as if iTunes is not looking at iPhoto for the actual event, but rather pulling its "event" data from somewhere else.
Is anyone else having this issue? This is horrendous, because now in my iPhone, I have multiple "Easter" events, so I can't view them without going in and out of each event separately.
This is definitely a bug that Apple should know about and fix. Any suggestions.
Cosmo
I have iTunes set to sync the last 12 months worth of events from iPhoto to my iPhone. I have never had a problem until today. I recently upgraded the new iPhoto '11 v9.1.2.
I'll take pictures on one day and then upload them into iPhoto. The next day or so, I'll do the same and Merge them into the same event. For instance, if the pictures are just random (no specific event like a birthday, etc.) I'll just name the event "March 2011" As such, I might take some photos early in the month and then merge some photos into that event that I've taken at the end of the month.
iTunes has always recognized my Merged events as a single entity. Now, in iTunes, all my events have multiple entries. In other words, I now show 4 separate March 2011 events in iTunes...even though iPhoto only has 1 actual event for March 2011. Its as if iTunes is not looking at iPhoto for the actual event, but rather pulling its "event" data from somewhere else.
Is anyone else having this issue? This is horrendous, because now in my iPhone, I have multiple "Easter" events, so I can't view them without going in and out of each event separately.
This is definitely a bug that Apple should know about and fix. Any suggestions.
Cosmo
lilkangster
Apr 27, 01:08 AM
Not saying its fake or anything... I have seen alot of people swearing at him, causing so much fued on his youtube and facebook account...
Its so true why would he faking it and using his both social network accounts.
But I didnt understand why doesnt he release just *unstable* version to show those people who doubt about it..... Release it let them see in the face that its real....
Hmm
Both of his social network accounts were created just last week for the sole purpose of showing off his "Jailbreak" but yea there are many many suspicious points to his jailbreak videos, and most of the more trustworthy figures in the jailbreak community has confirmed that this is indeed a fake.
Its so true why would he faking it and using his both social network accounts.
But I didnt understand why doesnt he release just *unstable* version to show those people who doubt about it..... Release it let them see in the face that its real....
Hmm
Both of his social network accounts were created just last week for the sole purpose of showing off his "Jailbreak" but yea there are many many suspicious points to his jailbreak videos, and most of the more trustworthy figures in the jailbreak community has confirmed that this is indeed a fake.
ppc_michael
Dec 29, 11:49 AM
I've long been stuck on analog NTSC crap, and I'm considering buying a Sony HDR-FX1, which is a high-definition video camera. However, when I try to play back the 1080i movie trailers from Apple's site, it's slightly choppy. If my PowerBook has a hard time handling HD playback, will I be able to capture HD in FinalCut Pro?
(1.67GHz 17" PowerBook G4)
(1.67GHz 17" PowerBook G4)
Flowbee
Aug 7, 06:21 PM
Why would they? The Intel models will run Windows anyhow. I don't think there would be much of a market for this product since the move to Intel is complete.
Tell that to the Parallels people. Bootcamp isn't the same thing.
Tell that to the Parallels people. Bootcamp isn't the same thing.
Macmaniac
Dec 31, 07:46 AM
Cool, a redesign is always good! Just in time for new Macs;)
Mudbug
Mar 11, 10:22 PM
just for the record, this link has been submitted around 10 times now, but I've been on the whole unimpressed by the desktops so far. Maybe by offering the link and getting some new blood in there, it will liven up.
gugy
Oct 26, 11:00 AM
I hope there is a click wheel.
Hopefully a physical one. Maybe is a slide panel with a click wheel like the newest phones.
I don't know. It would be interesting to see how easy to use and interesting this product will be.
I'll hold my excitement until I see one and try.
Hopefully a physical one. Maybe is a slide panel with a click wheel like the newest phones.
I don't know. It would be interesting to see how easy to use and interesting this product will be.
I'll hold my excitement until I see one and try.
Cinematographer
Apr 4, 03:59 PM
ya, it's supposed to be thousands of units and dollars.
Let's say thousands of units and millions of dollars, ok?
Let's say thousands of units and millions of dollars, ok?
JFreak
Mar 7, 07:14 AM
That video is a classic :)
no. that video is bad sense of humour :P
i just can't believe people have fun on somebody else's expense...
no. that video is bad sense of humour :P
i just can't believe people have fun on somebody else's expense...
Siggen
Apr 16, 05:55 AM
they are having trouble with the A5 bootrom. Looks bad.
But a userland exploit works, at least for 4.3 and partially for 4.3.x
Yhe reason the 4.3 jailbreak has yet to be released is that the hack contains apple code, and distrubuting the jailbreak would be piracy.
So i think he is trying to write his own code to exchange the apple parts.
But a userland exploit works, at least for 4.3 and partially for 4.3.x
Yhe reason the 4.3 jailbreak has yet to be released is that the hack contains apple code, and distrubuting the jailbreak would be piracy.
So i think he is trying to write his own code to exchange the apple parts.
VanMac
Sep 26, 07:44 AM
yup purchased on september 24th I always procrastinate (butchered spelling)
Me too.
I finally filled out my form, but found I was on day 47, and they say within 45 days. I called the rebate center. They were very nice, and said there is a 15 day grace period, but to get it in asap and I would be covered :)
Me too.
I finally filled out my form, but found I was on day 47, and they say within 45 days. I called the rebate center. They were very nice, and said there is a 15 day grace period, but to get it in asap and I would be covered :)
JavaTheHut
May 3, 05:01 PM
Follow-up question: OWC or TransIntl? I've been very happy with OWC in the past, but TransIntl is 15% cheaper and gets good reviews in this forum.
OWC have heat spreaders and TransIntl does NOT (I can speak for the 8GB sticks only)
OWC have heat spreaders and TransIntl does NOT (I can speak for the 8GB sticks only)
Zeterain
Mar 11, 11:05 PM
No, they were out of all white 3g all carriers. They still had a few Verizon black ones though.
I'm pretty sure that they are selling out tonight, but good luck if you try for one tomorrow. They may still have black wifis.
I'm pretty sure that they are selling out tonight, but good luck if you try for one tomorrow. They may still have black wifis.
varmit
Mar 23, 12:00 PM
I thought it was dead.
lexus
Jan 6, 09:53 AM
Has any one else noticed, or has it already been pointed out, that on the iCal image on the apple.com Leopard preview site
http://www.apple.com/macosx/leopard/ical.html
we see the iCal app open but the little black triangle under the icon in the dock is missing.
Just like the finder triangle on the MBP box.
http://www.apple.com/macosx/leopard/ical.html
we see the iCal app open but the little black triangle under the icon in the dock is missing.
Just like the finder triangle on the MBP box.
mattyb240
Nov 20, 03:22 PM
Here's mine�.
http://matt-booth.deviantart.com/
http://matt-booth.deviantart.com/